Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by alessandra perani on March 11, 2010 at 10:52am

young model, less retouching but a lot of energy and expressive eyes and body... secondo me...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David Ranc on April 8, 2010 at 6:08pm

I think underage models are never a good idea because they give unrealistic views & expectations of what a woman's body is like or should be like: it is not the same as a little girl's body. I tend to think 16-18 is a strict minimum. There is no upwards limit. It depends on who you market to. Retouching is not necessary. Women should look their age. There is absolutely nothing wrong with aging, or being imperfect... or not having a little girl's body.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by modaitalia.net staff on April 11, 2010 at 5:32pm

Maybe it's "morally right" but this is not the fashion market wants David...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pergita on October 19, 2010 at 4:56pm

The Giles Deacon catwalk at 2010 London fashion week featured several old models included the former German supermodel Veruschka age 71. Everything is possible in the fashion industry but the show looked a bit wired thought!. I will post an article about the London fashion week very soon, check out this space http://designersconfidential.blogspot.com/

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jamiya on March 1, 2012 at 2:14pm

I agree with models not should be underage but i don't the idea also of models whos age above 35 it really depends with skin but they are more glamorous looking.

• ▶ Reply

▶ Reply to Discussion